<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Your Voice In Annapolis - Latest Comments</title><link>http://yourvoiceinannapolis.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://yourvoiceinannapolis.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:49:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Legislative Hearing Date&amp;#8211;Internet Tax</title><link>http://www.yourvoiceinannapolis.com/legislative-hearing-date-internet-tax/#comment-250583987</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My understanding is that much of this issue is controlled at the Federal level - because of the Commerce Clause - and the feds don't allow states to collect sales tax from online sales unless the merchant has a physical presence in their state. I guess states are trying to figure a way around this in an effort to close huge state debts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;California recently tried that approach - and the largest online retailer, Amazon, fought back. I posted about it last week on &lt;a href="http://Interversant.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Interversant.com"&gt;Interversant.com&lt;/a&gt; : &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/mnkhxK" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/mnkhxK"&gt;http://bit.ly/mnkhxK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Myrick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:49:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>